NCIS: Model Behavior Spoilers
Dec. 13th, 2005 11:58 pmNo, whacking off the girlish locks did not endear Madame Director to me. STOPPING THE FECKING FLASHBACKS would be a start, followed by allowing the woman to lead, but never, ever will there be a point to her existence.
I'm to understand that Ziva has never interrogated anyone without causing pain, but still needs Tony to explain Gibbs's techniques to her? I guess only the US intelligence community ever even tries to obtain information without torture. How cool are we?
Babes in bikinis? And the promo said twisted love triangle? And there was no girl-on-girl action? What sort of ripoff is this? No wonder Tony was barely there for this nonsense. OK, except insofar as he hightlighted the relative depth of Marines who do not get after supermodels. Or something.
I liked Bones better. Firefly reruns were mentioned! Yay!
I'm to understand that Ziva has never interrogated anyone without causing pain, but still needs Tony to explain Gibbs's techniques to her? I guess only the US intelligence community ever even tries to obtain information without torture. How cool are we?
Babes in bikinis? And the promo said twisted love triangle? And there was no girl-on-girl action? What sort of ripoff is this? No wonder Tony was barely there for this nonsense. OK, except insofar as he hightlighted the relative depth of Marines who do not get after supermodels. Or something.
I liked Bones better. Firefly reruns were mentioned! Yay!
no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 07:55 pm (UTC)When they kept bringing up Madame Bitch Director's haircut, I kept saying they should have cut it a lot shorter, as in her whole head. Might stop the damn flashbacks. Though I am getting the impression that maybe they keep doing the flashbacks because they're going to lead up to something (besides hitting us over the head that they had sex) in the story later on. I live in delusional hope.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-14 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-15 02:48 pm (UTC)